11 Comments
User's avatar
Jonathan Carrier's avatar

I like Paquette's Law!

Expand full comment
Michelle Morgan's avatar

Hi there. I have been actively involved in election fraud in CA. Are you working with a group or on your own? Would you like to work with other patriots? Thanks for all you do!🇺🇸

Expand full comment
Rinostone Cowboy's avatar

I’m not overly educated but I don’t understand in this modern day technology how a voter ID number/ system can’t be identified and verified by ss #’s ensuring American/ state citizenship? Any politician or official that is against a verifiable voting system is the person(s) that benefits from cheating and election fraud!

It seems pretty simple and easy enough to stop the larceny of our country!

Expand full comment
NC ForSubstack's avatar

I had a “rough draft” idea on this too. Here is what that looks like: https://gab.com/nc4gab/posts/114238602596790297

Expand full comment
NC ForSubstack's avatar

If someone has a clone he/she doesn’t know about, and both that person and his/her clone vote in the same election, is that person liable for the crime of the double vote? 🤔

Expand full comment
Andrew Paquette, PhD's avatar

Potentially, but practically speaking, unlikely. I read about a man in NYC who was arrested for this a few years ago. I looked him up in the rolls and saw he did have about 5 registration numbers, but so do over a million other people. I seriously doubted he had any idea those excess numbers were in his name. He was released after about a week. I would love to find that story again because I want to write about it, but I forgot his name. I think he was an immigrant from the Caribbean and that he lived in Brooklyn or Bronx, but not sure about that.

Expand full comment
NC ForSubstack's avatar

I tried asking Perplexity AI but it didn’t know from what I asked based on my understanding of what you had said. Technology can be a blessing and a challenge (I’ll DM you briefly on an aspect of this momentarily).

Expand full comment
David Roberts's avatar

"It is unknown at present why these were made, but their mere existence seems to violate the federal requirement that each voter is given a “unique identifier”. Two, it seems to me, is more than one, and thus not unique."

I don't know how WI uses these encrypted IDs or what they are for, but from a database perspective (e.g., SQL), it's sometimes useful to create a "composite key" that uniquely identifies a record by combining two otherwise non-unique columns. As long as they always use them together and don't assume that either one by itself is unique, there isn't necessarily an issue from a DB perspective. This is effectively what your doctor's office or pharmacist is doing when they ask you for your name and birth date. As you've pointed out, Andrew, this is fairly unique, particularly at a local level.

Again, I don't know what these IDs are for or how they are used at polling places (e.g., to detect repeat voting, etc.) or in any processing that happens for the purpose of the election. I also don't know how those federal requirements are written. So, perhaps having another ID does violate these requirements.

Expand full comment
Andrew Paquette, PhD's avatar

Here are a few examples, so you know what they look like:

kskVWrzEWW

FedMb64n8u

qZtjK6N0XE

uf0ROEpFWk

ZYOs+bSyjn

PBUsYMMHfK

s+59RFu6XL

Expand full comment
David Roberts's avatar

Yea, so "randomish" identifiers. But how do they use them? Does a voter have to present their voter ID and this other jumble of letters to vote, for instance? What is this column in the data file labeled?

Expand full comment
Kathryn Bartelli's avatar

There is no requirement in WI for people to register to vote with their formal name so then it may result in someone forgetting how they registered, (or purposely registered multiple times) if it was John F Smith Sr, Johnny Smith, John Smith, John Fitzgerald Smith, John F Smith Jr etc.

Expand full comment