You have outdone yourself with this last round of sleuthing -- WOW 🤠
And why not have one more way-too-weird coincidence/divine intervention. I mean, if I understand this correctly, you would not have found the pattern if you had all the data when you began the first pass. Incredible.
It may be beneficial to share your work with them so they can help with the legal issues of forcing this to happen. They've been working on "clean up" for years, but maybe a change of focus to "tear down" and rebuild is warranted; hopefully they could help effect that to happen. (?)
Elon looking for a way to make the Federal Government operate more efficiently.
How about creating a one-man-one-day-per-week Federal agency (staffed by Dr. Paquette) to nail down the rest of the voter roll frauds across all 50 states and US territories, and anything else "Doc" chooses to look into... Plenty of time left in the week to pursue more pleasurable interests and only cost the taxpayers, say, couple hundred thou per year. Full access to FBI to run helpful "errands" and subpoena power. The job only has to last as long as the Doc thinks it's useful--I trust him.
I read the report over at research gate. A question:
-"For a false positive clone match to occur, individuals must share the same full name (12% probability)"
this seems way off... Can't be 12%. I asked Google:
- Estimating that a very small percentage of people in California would share the exact same full name, likely less than 0.01% of the population, as the combination of first and last names is statistically very unlikely to be identical for multiple people.
Also, does the database actually have separate fields for both the date of birth and the age? I'm not a DBA expert but this seems unusual. In general, it's not good practice to store redundant data. In this case age can be easily be derived from date of birth. why two fields?
The actual number of duplicate names in this database is 12%. For the purpose of making a conservative estimate of a name/age match, I used 12% as the base probability, because that is what it actually is. Whether that is the generalized chance of a duplicate name is a much more complicated proposition, and unnecessary for what I wanted to do. Maybe later. As you said on the phone, maybe it is a high number of matched names for a reason.
Great work. The California report is very concise and readable. It forms the probable cause for the action that needs to be taken - destroy and rewrite. I share the idea of Judicial Watch being useful going forward. Of course they have to be turned around in their thinking. DOGE may be an answer, but I'm afraid they have bigger fish to fry.
You have outdone yourself with this last round of sleuthing -- WOW 🤠
And why not have one more way-too-weird coincidence/divine intervention. I mean, if I understand this correctly, you would not have found the pattern if you had all the data when you began the first pass. Incredible.
Bingo, Alex! My thoughts exactly.
Correct
The lightning strikes in NY were a cool divine intervention, though. 🙂⚡️⚡️
Do you partner at all with Judicial Watch, the law firm battling to clean up voter registration rolls?
No. I don't think they can be cleaned up. They must be erased, the software destroyed, and start over.
It may be beneficial to share your work with them so they can help with the legal issues of forcing this to happen. They've been working on "clean up" for years, but maybe a change of focus to "tear down" and rebuild is warranted; hopefully they could help effect that to happen. (?)
Elon looking for a way to make the Federal Government operate more efficiently.
How about creating a one-man-one-day-per-week Federal agency (staffed by Dr. Paquette) to nail down the rest of the voter roll frauds across all 50 states and US territories, and anything else "Doc" chooses to look into... Plenty of time left in the week to pursue more pleasurable interests and only cost the taxpayers, say, couple hundred thou per year. Full access to FBI to run helpful "errands" and subpoena power. The job only has to last as long as the Doc thinks it's useful--I trust him.
I read the report over at research gate. A question:
-"For a false positive clone match to occur, individuals must share the same full name (12% probability)"
this seems way off... Can't be 12%. I asked Google:
- Estimating that a very small percentage of people in California would share the exact same full name, likely less than 0.01% of the population, as the combination of first and last names is statistically very unlikely to be identical for multiple people.
Also, does the database actually have separate fields for both the date of birth and the age? I'm not a DBA expert but this seems unusual. In general, it's not good practice to store redundant data. In this case age can be easily be derived from date of birth. why two fields?
The actual number of duplicate names in this database is 12%. For the purpose of making a conservative estimate of a name/age match, I used 12% as the base probability, because that is what it actually is. Whether that is the generalized chance of a duplicate name is a much more complicated proposition, and unnecessary for what I wanted to do. Maybe later. As you said on the phone, maybe it is a high number of matched names for a reason.
Thank you Andrew.
Let us hope for a crisis of conscience from the programmers involved in the obfuscation. People change sometimes.
Hopefully all of your hard work will lead to arrests and prosecution and the stealing of our states and great nation finally ends!
Great work. The California report is very concise and readable. It forms the probable cause for the action that needs to be taken - destroy and rewrite. I share the idea of Judicial Watch being useful going forward. Of course they have to be turned around in their thinking. DOGE may be an answer, but I'm afraid they have bigger fish to fry.