After following your remarkable analysis for some time now, I have just come to a conclusion, while staring at the row of states' data you have looked at. You have been looking at databases which I now refuse to refer to as "Voter Rolls." Especially since I still send people to read your "The Bus Problem" 3 January 2024 post.
I was renewing my driver's license a couple of weeks ago at one of the "free enterprise" Dept. of Motor Vehicles "agencies(?)". The computer screen, tied to the state's database, announces to me that "You are registering to vote..." It is the First item! I told the "free enterprise" clerk that I was already registered to vote. He directed me to then answer "no" regarding whether I lived in the state or some other question to "skip" to the "next" section. The question was Not "Are you already registered to vote?" Why would I be inclined to view my "citizenship" of this specific community tied to my wanting to operate a motor vehicle in the state? But that's not all. You have all of these eager "party affiliated" people "authorized" to sign off on a person's voter registration form to be later turned into the county clerk's office. Really???
To vote for anything brought before a corporation's annual or special shareholders' meeting a list of Shareholders of Record at a specific date is generated. A "shareholder" is a member by owning a share of stock at that point in time. As you have shown "mist on the wind" can be "electronically" registered to vote. I don't think you Even need a whisp of mist. The electronic voter roll is merely a census pool made up/& not made up of stock (as in ie: cattle) to move dollars. I am so disgusted with electronics and the numb-minded clerks who process records.
Voter Rolls have become fantasy when you have "Senator" Adam Schiff's primary residence sitting in Maryland when he claims to be representing the people who live in California. Can we at least get some of those types of people arrested? Sigh.
Thank you for all the hard work and focus! You are "The Key."
Gaining Momentum in Pa, is the E-Polling Books. When voters arrived previously, they signed a paper book in ink and that was compared to a digital copy in the physical book.
Ebooks already have and know the signature. Bad Actors COULD conceivably inject voters into this ebook and use the digital signature to mask that a Voter In Person hadn't really shown up at the polls. Especially if their party is losing in the early morning hours.
Thanks to Dr Paquette, we know state voter registration database systems embedded with algorithms and clones are the fountainhead of systematic voter fraud. They serve as the data warehouse or repository for illegal voter id assignment.
Not to worry? We are being told elections will become freer and fairer, because the secondary—integrated system—that tabulates the votes in many states is in new hands.
Dominion was recently sold to a new company, “Liberty Vote”, owned by Scott Leiendecker who also owns KNOWiNK, the leading provider of Electronic Poll Books. He is a former GOP election official (Uni-Party? perhaps an associate of Rupert Murdoch?) I have no trust in this sale nor the black boxes that it will own and sell.
Yeah! I always shake my head when a state issues sequential voter ID numbers.... Yet several youthful voters have numbers lower then our Seniors, or the numbers are just out of sequence (based on registration dates).
Giving out numbers in sequence on a first come, first serve registration basis should not be this difficult!!
Maybe. I'd like to find a control set. The problem is that the cleanest states still aren't "clean". Also, in this case, I wonder if there is a clean state that also has an algorithm. Not looking that way so far,. That gives me an idea though. Look at states where the expectation is honest and accurate and see if they have algos. Then compare to the other states. A top of mind impression is that there is a positive correlation between number/complexity of algorithms and number of other types of suspicious records, like clones. The three states without algos all have very low clone rates. Among states with algos, the two most complex (NY and WI) also have the highest clone rates.
After following your remarkable analysis for some time now, I have just come to a conclusion, while staring at the row of states' data you have looked at. You have been looking at databases which I now refuse to refer to as "Voter Rolls." Especially since I still send people to read your "The Bus Problem" 3 January 2024 post.
I was renewing my driver's license a couple of weeks ago at one of the "free enterprise" Dept. of Motor Vehicles "agencies(?)". The computer screen, tied to the state's database, announces to me that "You are registering to vote..." It is the First item! I told the "free enterprise" clerk that I was already registered to vote. He directed me to then answer "no" regarding whether I lived in the state or some other question to "skip" to the "next" section. The question was Not "Are you already registered to vote?" Why would I be inclined to view my "citizenship" of this specific community tied to my wanting to operate a motor vehicle in the state? But that's not all. You have all of these eager "party affiliated" people "authorized" to sign off on a person's voter registration form to be later turned into the county clerk's office. Really???
To vote for anything brought before a corporation's annual or special shareholders' meeting a list of Shareholders of Record at a specific date is generated. A "shareholder" is a member by owning a share of stock at that point in time. As you have shown "mist on the wind" can be "electronically" registered to vote. I don't think you Even need a whisp of mist. The electronic voter roll is merely a census pool made up/& not made up of stock (as in ie: cattle) to move dollars. I am so disgusted with electronics and the numb-minded clerks who process records.
Voter Rolls have become fantasy when you have "Senator" Adam Schiff's primary residence sitting in Maryland when he claims to be representing the people who live in California. Can we at least get some of those types of people arrested? Sigh.
Thank you for all the hard work and focus! You are "The Key."
Gaining Momentum in Pa, is the E-Polling Books. When voters arrived previously, they signed a paper book in ink and that was compared to a digital copy in the physical book.
Ebooks already have and know the signature. Bad Actors COULD conceivably inject voters into this ebook and use the digital signature to mask that a Voter In Person hadn't really shown up at the polls. Especially if their party is losing in the early morning hours.
Thanks to Dr Paquette, we know state voter registration database systems embedded with algorithms and clones are the fountainhead of systematic voter fraud. They serve as the data warehouse or repository for illegal voter id assignment.
Not to worry? We are being told elections will become freer and fairer, because the secondary—integrated system—that tabulates the votes in many states is in new hands.
Dominion was recently sold to a new company, “Liberty Vote”, owned by Scott Leiendecker who also owns KNOWiNK, the leading provider of Electronic Poll Books. He is a former GOP election official (Uni-Party? perhaps an associate of Rupert Murdoch?) I have no trust in this sale nor the black boxes that it will own and sell.
Yeah! I always shake my head when a state issues sequential voter ID numbers.... Yet several youthful voters have numbers lower then our Seniors, or the numbers are just out of sequence (based on registration dates).
Giving out numbers in sequence on a first come, first serve registration basis should not be this difficult!!
-Mo
A dim light in a dark forest.
Does this make the Kansas data set valuable as a control? Or maybe it doesn't work that way for this kind of data analysis?
Maybe. I'd like to find a control set. The problem is that the cleanest states still aren't "clean". Also, in this case, I wonder if there is a clean state that also has an algorithm. Not looking that way so far,. That gives me an idea though. Look at states where the expectation is honest and accurate and see if they have algos. Then compare to the other states. A top of mind impression is that there is a positive correlation between number/complexity of algorithms and number of other types of suspicious records, like clones. The three states without algos all have very low clone rates. Among states with algos, the two most complex (NY and WI) also have the highest clone rates.
…because Kansans are fine people. So this does not surprise me.