Nothing to disagree with in the analysis; if anything, the analysis seems have to been rather restrained as to how horrible Jackson's (lack of) legal reasoning truly is....
Actually, I think the illustration is fitting. Jackson needs to be KOed. If Amy has heavy enough hands she can do it. Chick fight! Honestly, these women drive me nuts.
This is a scolding rebuke from a pissed off professor, Claude ai. I think Claude sniffed out 60 years of Affirmative Action vis-à-vis political activism become permanent resident on the highest court in the land.
Designed within Claude ai is something called Constitutional ai, which is embedded intentionally to add helpful legal and ethical precepts to its training and guidelines. With the exception of Claude’s built in bias when challenged on election fraud, this added feature seems to balance that flaw with some dimension of truth. Great un-article/article by Dr. Andrew Paquette hi (human intelligence)!
I was wondering what kind of Justice Amy Coney Barrett was after some of her more recent rulings, for which I had nicknamed her “Amy Phony Barrett”; however, after this most recent elegantly written majority opinion and intellectual smackdown of Jackson, I’ve revised my nickname to “Amy HONEy Barrett” since she has certainly honed her writing skills to produce such a sweet 🍯 summary and well-deserved rebuke of the Court’s newest member! 🙂👍🇺🇸🫡
Wow.
And needs to be published for the whole country to read. Assuming the country can still read.
Bravo! Quick and thorough take-down of the leftist mode of legal thinking from far too many and shocking from someone on the Supreme Court!!
Nothing to disagree with in the analysis; if anything, the analysis seems have to been rather restrained as to how horrible Jackson's (lack of) legal reasoning truly is....
ps: This is one of the most enjoyable Dr. Zark posts I’ve had the privilege to add its URL to my ongoing collection at tinyURL.com/ZarkAsksAI
Actually, I think the illustration is fitting. Jackson needs to be KOed. If Amy has heavy enough hands she can do it. Chick fight! Honestly, these women drive me nuts.
This is a scolding rebuke from a pissed off professor, Claude ai. I think Claude sniffed out 60 years of Affirmative Action vis-à-vis political activism become permanent resident on the highest court in the land.
Designed within Claude ai is something called Constitutional ai, which is embedded intentionally to add helpful legal and ethical precepts to its training and guidelines. With the exception of Claude’s built in bias when challenged on election fraud, this added feature seems to balance that flaw with some dimension of truth. Great un-article/article by Dr. Andrew Paquette hi (human intelligence)!
I love it. Lots better comments from others. I second the motion to somehow publish this. Brown is definitely out of place.
Thank you, justice Jackson for speaking the truth.
Beautiful synopsis. Jeff Childers also had a writeup earlier this week that also masterfully discussed this.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/template-saturday-june-28-2025-c
I was wondering what kind of Justice Amy Coney Barrett was after some of her more recent rulings, for which I had nicknamed her “Amy Phony Barrett”; however, after this most recent elegantly written majority opinion and intellectual smackdown of Jackson, I’ve revised my nickname to “Amy HONEy Barrett” since she has certainly honed her writing skills to produce such a sweet 🍯 summary and well-deserved rebuke of the Court’s newest member! 🙂👍🇺🇸🫡
And 6 justices signed on to this rebuke!!!
This is the funniest and most eye-opening use of AI I have seen in a long time! ☺️