"More examples would multiply the evidence; they would not multiply the conclusion." Agreed. I'm beginning to feel the same way with my research too. There is plenty of evidence of problems that need to be fixed to make our elections more accurate and within legal boundaries. What we are lacking is the political and prosecutorial will to take that evidence into court for adjudication. Citizen researchers and whistleblowers are great and necessary in a democratic Republic. Now it's time for those who can take that evidence to the next stage to step up and do their job.
One of your (several!) best articles! I hope it's read by the Supreme Court judges; Harmeet Dillon; and whoever the President may have designated as point-person to know EVERYTHING relevant to making America's Federal and all elections accurate and secure. Thank you Andrew for your masterful work and patriotism.
Can't wait to read your opinion on President Trump's address regarding election fraud and the immediate responses from the mainstream media. From what I've seen, and it's early yet, it's more of the same accusations against Trump and election "conspiracy" theories. It's so disheartening Having volunteered for three organizations actively trying to get to the cruc of theatter of election security I have seen first-hand (as have you) how the press and politicians do not want to hear about it. Unless someone holds their feet to the fire, no amount of evidence or truth will be enough to change their false narratives.
“CBS News Election Law contributor,” David Becker, executive director of CEIR—who helped orchestrate the ‘most secure election ever’ in 2020—recently interviewed with Margaret Brennan. The over-the-shoulder graphic in the CBS interview reads ELECTION SECURITY. It could have just as well been an Infomercial for the “Completely Secure Bank” of your previous article.
Becker is the antithesis to the crux of your article’s arguments. Media propagandists actively move public opinion to normalize the acceptance of inaccurate or uncertifiable election processes. Flawed methods are being treated as the standard way of running elections. They accuse election integrity advocates of spreading lies, and characterize them as conspiracy nuts. Prosecute the propagandists as well, they are active accomplices.
"More examples would multiply the evidence; they would not multiply the conclusion." Agreed. I'm beginning to feel the same way with my research too. There is plenty of evidence of problems that need to be fixed to make our elections more accurate and within legal boundaries. What we are lacking is the political and prosecutorial will to take that evidence into court for adjudication. Citizen researchers and whistleblowers are great and necessary in a democratic Republic. Now it's time for those who can take that evidence to the next stage to step up and do their job.
One of your (several!) best articles! I hope it's read by the Supreme Court judges; Harmeet Dillon; and whoever the President may have designated as point-person to know EVERYTHING relevant to making America's Federal and all elections accurate and secure. Thank you Andrew for your masterful work and patriotism.
Can't wait to read your opinion on President Trump's address regarding election fraud and the immediate responses from the mainstream media. From what I've seen, and it's early yet, it's more of the same accusations against Trump and election "conspiracy" theories. It's so disheartening Having volunteered for three organizations actively trying to get to the cruc of theatter of election security I have seen first-hand (as have you) how the press and politicians do not want to hear about it. Unless someone holds their feet to the fire, no amount of evidence or truth will be enough to change their false narratives.
“CBS News Election Law contributor,” David Becker, executive director of CEIR—who helped orchestrate the ‘most secure election ever’ in 2020—recently interviewed with Margaret Brennan. The over-the-shoulder graphic in the CBS interview reads ELECTION SECURITY. It could have just as well been an Infomercial for the “Completely Secure Bank” of your previous article.
Becker is the antithesis to the crux of your article’s arguments. Media propagandists actively move public opinion to normalize the acceptance of inaccurate or uncertifiable election processes. Flawed methods are being treated as the standard way of running elections. They accuse election integrity advocates of spreading lies, and characterize them as conspiracy nuts. Prosecute the propagandists as well, they are active accomplices.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipTSbraIUZs
https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/center-for-election-innovation-research/
The U.S. Election System has been proven fraudulent.
Americans don't care enough about that to revolt.
Hence, Americans have the government they deserve. The End.