Awesome forensic investigation and intelligence written in clear English that any literate American can comprehend, if they decide to read the evidence presented. Grateful thanks for you, Dr. Zark.
if you consider the results of stolen elections the gains to the criminals are greater than the risk. we ve run 5 consecutive national elections that have every conservative shaking their head's saying how the heck did he or she win? the fact that democrats have won 99.99999999 % of extended election counting kinda tells us who s cheating. the question is who will fix the problem before the next civil war? i don t think republican politicians are up to the challenge
“i don t think republican politicians are up to the challenge.”
Some of them are benefitting from those chickens too.
Peter Bernegger who filed a complaint with the Texas SOS seems to think so:
Remember how 4,110 fraudulent registrations were created in Bexar County Texas? Which would have triggered a signal to generate a ballot - look at how much John Cornyn "won" over Ken Paxton in Bexar Cty:
Absolutely true. And also logical that something done so thoroughly is not just being done on one county on one day that happened to be seen. Whoever’s got the disbelief going is guilty, at least as an accomplice.
In Indiana, 79 out of 92 counties use KnowInk, according to the relevant state website.
Indiana Code includes this provision:
Indiana Code Title 3. Elections § 3-11-17-7(g):
A vendor must report, not later than fourteen (14) days after discovery, an anomaly occurring outside Indiana involving the same election system type, make, model, or component certified for use in Indiana.
Raising the question of a potential reporting violation might be one way to get this issue in front of the Secretary of State in states that have this or similar provisions in their election code.
The problem with anomaly reports in Indiana is they are labeled confidential by statute, and are not disclosed in response to FOIA-style requests except at the discretion of the SoS.
It’s time the chickens come home to roost. 🐓👀‼️
Awesome forensic investigation and intelligence written in clear English that any literate American can comprehend, if they decide to read the evidence presented. Grateful thanks for you, Dr. Zark.
if you consider the results of stolen elections the gains to the criminals are greater than the risk. we ve run 5 consecutive national elections that have every conservative shaking their head's saying how the heck did he or she win? the fact that democrats have won 99.99999999 % of extended election counting kinda tells us who s cheating. the question is who will fix the problem before the next civil war? i don t think republican politicians are up to the challenge
“i don t think republican politicians are up to the challenge.”
Some of them are benefitting from those chickens too.
Peter Bernegger who filed a complaint with the Texas SOS seems to think so:
Remember how 4,110 fraudulent registrations were created in Bexar County Texas? Which would have triggered a signal to generate a ballot - look at how much John Cornyn "won" over Ken Paxton in Bexar Cty:
Cornyn 42,804
Paxton's 38,796 = 4,008
Absolutely true. And also logical that something done so thoroughly is not just being done on one county on one day that happened to be seen. Whoever’s got the disbelief going is guilty, at least as an accomplice.
Andrew, bravo for all-around work by you !
Time we all finish endless proving and now start BEFORE the midterms 11/2026:
1- halting electronic voting/check-in
2- purging electronic voter rolls
3- hunting down and indicting by DHS/DOJ both criminal voters and IT staff
1--Start with NO EVM, a no-brainer nationwide both FEDERAL AND STATE down-ballot candidates and instead hire more election day staff as done by:
- Netherlands 2007 after vulnerabilities shown (Ha! like you prove)
- Germany 2009 as unconstitutional
- Ireland 2010 over costs AND distrust
- even freaking Kazakhstan 2011 preferring paper ballots
- Finland 2017 as risks outweighed benefits
- Japan 2018. Period.
2--Next ADD your call to clean up check-in / voter roll DATA BASES.
So the SAVE AMERICA ACT has to EXPAND to prevent ELECTRONIC FRAUD across the board:
1--PROOF of citizenship = voter
2--Photo ID--> ballot
3--NO unwarranted mail-in ballots
4--ONE DAY voting
5--REGULAR Voter Roll maintenance and purges by DOJ of fraudulent citizenship AND your alert of FAKE voters
6--DHS / DOJ find-arrest-punish FELONY IT fraudsters manipulating check-in / voter data bases
Praying you are imminently putting the DHS / DOJ in gear, Andrew!
In Indiana, 79 out of 92 counties use KnowInk, according to the relevant state website.
Indiana Code includes this provision:
Indiana Code Title 3. Elections § 3-11-17-7(g):
A vendor must report, not later than fourteen (14) days after discovery, an anomaly occurring outside Indiana involving the same election system type, make, model, or component certified for use in Indiana.
Raising the question of a potential reporting violation might be one way to get this issue in front of the Secretary of State in states that have this or similar provisions in their election code.
The problem with anomaly reports in Indiana is they are labeled confidential by statute, and are not disclosed in response to FOIA-style requests except at the discretion of the SoS.
Who what does Ken Paxton have to say about all this? Is he not the one that has legal and skin in the game?
I like the chicken analogy.