Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Obidienzo's avatar

Maybe not the ace up their sleeve

The State of Colorado took what was shared jurisdiction and applied the law uniquely and maliciously as the sole adjudicator on Tina, who was acting as a federal official as much as she was acting as a state or county official.

The States run elections that also determine federal office holders under a shared jurisdiction. State laws, however, must align with federal law under the standards set by HAVA or other federal statutes.

Federal laws often overlap with State laws.

Concurrent powers are a common feature of our system called federalism. There is shared authority between the State and Federal governments when federal elections are simultaneously conducted with state or local elections.

The State of Colorado took upon itself supreme authority to act independently of federal guidance in the application of what was ‘shared’ federal and state jurisdiction.

Trump’s pardon is preemptive to the overlapping federal and state statutes, which must hold that the federal component of the law has SUPREMACY over the state component of the law, regardless of the fact they are shared. Hence, Trump’s federal pardon powers preempt the totality of the state’s actions, actions taken to evade their own violation of federal election statutes.

The Presidents pardon may set the Ultimus Optimus Locus, the last best place to expose the corrupted source codes within electronic voting tabulators and other such systems which run a state’s voter registration database.

Expand full comment
GAVEMartin's avatar

This "cattle drive" reminds me of "Lonesome Dove." However, the ending pastures will be quite different for these people. Thank you. We need to keep driving forward. I just witnessed another manufactured mayors' race. I am sure it is already on the "evidence stack."

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?