The Fabergé Cantaloupe

I have been asked many times to explain the importance of unnecessarily complex algorithms found in various state voter rolls. The simple version is this: it’s like opening a cantaloupe and finding a multi-million dollar Fabergé egg inside.

It makes you wonder how it got there, who put it there, how long it’s been there, how much it cost and what it is worth to whoever put it there.

To date, I have examined voter roll databases from ten states and am aware of one more that was looked at by someone else. Of the group, ten have inexplicable peculiarities, like so many Fabergé eggs in cantaloupes.

The most common oddity is that voter ID numbers were not assigned in any manner that is consistent with standard database practice. Why not? what made it worth the extra time, and therefore money, to do it differently?

To make it more interesting, many of the algorithms involved are so sophisticated that they imply a serious effort by talented programmers. This implies work orders with signatures of supervisors who have reasons to ask for the extra work. It also suggests the possibility of talented contractors hired for the purpose.

My research has been public since May of 2023, after publication of my first journal article in the Journal of Information Warfare. That article provoked significant public interest (over 10,000,000 views in 48 hours on X of Wendi Strauch Mahoney’s article about my article.) One might expect that at least one official would have tried to explain the findings in my article, but none has come forward. Is it because the algorithms are just as mysterious to them as they are to everyone else? That raises even more interesting questions.

Then there are the millions of cloned records. In NY, GA, AZ, WI, and elsewhere. These are on their face illegal. Now combine the illegal records with mysterious algorithms, the lack of any serious official response, and the fact that the algorithms could be used for nefarious purposes. What could that mean? Illegal records are inherently nefarious, but their presence isn’t necessarily related to the algorithms. Maybe, maybe not.

Something interesting about Fabergé eggs is that most of them have a “surprise” inside. In one, it is another jeweled egg. Are algorithms like that too? Do they conceal something in addition to being concealed themselves?

This explanation must sound like a bunch of hocus pocus smoke and mirrors, but I’ve made the technical reports already. The details, raw figures, and statistical analyses have been done. You can find them on this website, my ResearchGate page, GodsFiveStones.com, and in various articles written by Jerome Corsi and others. What remains is the question, why does it matter?

These algorithms matter because they don’t belong, like a multi-million dollar jeweled egg inside a cantaloupe, built into or grown with the cantaloupe, seamlessly integrated with it, invisible unless opened. The difference is that there is a reason to open a cantaloupe, to eat it. What is the reason to open the databases so that the algorithms can be used?

The database experts I’ve consulted on this consistently react the same way, “That doesn’t belong. There is no legitimate reason for that to be there.” That’s why the algorithms are important.

At least, until a credible explanation comes forward.