The 2020 Elections: ready to be served
Ironically, when I am doing the most work, readers here see me the least. Last month, I was looking into Wisconsin pretty heavily, and using up a lot of my space on my brand new 10TB mirrored RAID unit to do it. This, month, I have been making requested revisions to three articles for peer-reviewed publications, and started a fourth.
The articles had to be dealt with right away because it looks as if, though this isn’t confirmed yet, all three will be published in the same issue next month. The two that are all but confirmed for that issue are the Wisconsin and Texas papers. The maybe in the group is my Ohio paper. And as usually happens, I made more discoveries in Wisconsin after submitting the paper, but they won’t be published because they are too late.
One thing I would like to do however, is share an excerpt from the Ohio paper, because it is relevant to President Trump’s recent order for a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 elections. Or to put it differently, he made a post on Truth Social asking for this:
”Zero Border crossings for the month for TRUMP, verses 60,000 for Sleepy, Crooked Joe Biden, a man who lost the 2020 Presidential Election by a ‘LANDSLIDE!,’ Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD! The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING.”
“A Special Prosecutor must be appointed,” he added. “This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin! What this Crooked man, and his CORRUPT CRONIES, have done to our Country in 4 years, is grossly indescribable!'”
This post seems like it reflects President Trump’s intentions, so I won’t be surprised if a Special Prosecutor is appointed in the coming days or weeks. Part of the reason I won’t be surprised is that he has done other things recently that indicate he hasn’t forgotten the hot mess that was 2020.
Recent federal enforcement actions demonstrate that voter registration system irregularities of the type I have documented, as well as those documented by others (like Jeff O’Donnell, Seth Keshel, Peter Bernegger, Rudy Giuliani, Sydney Powell, and many others, are now triggering immediate federal consequences. Executive Order 14248 of March 25, 2025 (Trump, 2025), directed the Department of Justice (DOJ) to enforce federal election laws protecting against "fraud, errors, or suspicion" that undermine democratic processes, with immediate consequences for non-compliant states.
Within months, this enforcement framework produced concrete actions: Wisconsin was threatened with the loss of $77 million in federal funding for HAVA violations (Dhillon, 2025), and a federal lawsuit was filed against North Carolina for voter registration list maintenance failures citing the Executive Order as authority (Dhillon et al., 2025a). Arizona’s Secretary of State, Adrian Fontes, has received formal notice from the DOJ of HAVA violations (Riordan, 2025), and the DOJ has filed a statement of interest in a related case filed by the organization Judicial Watch regarding public access to voter registration records in the state of Oregon (Dhillon et al., 2025b). These actions establish that Ohio's systematic failures—including the undocumented algorithmic systems I’ve found—present clear compliance vulnerabilities under the same enforcement framework.
Section 8(i)(1) of NVRA requires states to maintain and make available for public inspection 'all records concerning the implementation of programs and activities conducted for the purpose of ensuring the accuracy and currency of official lists of eligible voters.' When voter ID assignment algorithms operate through complex and concealed mechanisms, transparency requirements are compromised. These complex database systems make enforcing legal requirements particularly challenging.
These algorithms create distinctions between records without visible indication of differentiation. Such implementation raises several concerns: increased error probability, unnecessary costs, vulnerability to exploitation, and potential for record manipulation to influence electoral outcomes—effectively achieving what Downes (2018) describes as "objectives equivalent to warfare."
Official responses demonstrate a consistent pattern where they acknowledge data irregularities while treating explanations as sufficient justification for maintaining compromised data in critical infrastructure systems. Legal counsel for election officials has acknowledged the existence of systematic database problems—including illegal multiple registrations, false registration dates, and missing federal election records—while defending these failures as normal administrative variations. Such responses illustrate how institutional defences focus on procedural explanations rather than data integrity remediation, treating the existence of administrative explanations as evidence of system acceptability regardless of documented legal violations and technical failures.
So that’s the (heavily abridged) small excerpt from one of these upcoming papers. The point is that this time around, unlike late 2020 and the next few years afterward, there seems to be a political will to do something about the massive election fraud carried out in 2020.
It’s not like it was hard to find. Evidence was never the issue. As time passed, more evidence accumulated. It either supported previous claims or expanded them. This was not like a hunt for Big Foot or UFOs, where continued investigation only yields more unanswered questions. In this case, research answered those questions, sometimes conclusively.
I was told more than once by individuals in law enforcement that no one would investigate these matters because there was no political will to solve the problem. I’ve been told the same by the few politicians I’ve spoken with. On this subject, President Trump is proving to be more courageous than anyone else, because he is willing to look into the stinking mess and deal with a serious problem that seems to scare every other politician out of their wits.
Here is a general addendum to this post:
The Deep State has clearly been running elections for some time now, probably not less than 15 years or so. They seem to have mostly helped Democrats, but it looks like they've helped not a few untrustworthy Republicans as well.
That said, our Electoral College is a fantastic safeguard against the type of illegal interventions we've been seeing. The reason is that it limits exposure at the federal level by making each state independent. Therefore, once a threshhold is reached in any given state, more fraud in the same state accomplishes nothing.
Honest states can counterbalance dishonest ones, and seem to have done exactly that, though the number of such states has been eroding. At the local level, it is more difficult to control, because the safeguards disappear once you get into state politics. However, there are ways for federal controls to affect local elections.
The problem has been lack of will to have honest elections among many officials until recently. Trump's recent efforts have the potential to turn the tide, and certainly are trying to do that.
I wonder why there is such fear on the part of politicians. They must know who's behind it if they are. Or maybe they've been "selected" themselves, and they don't want an investigation to show that.